UPDATE: Proposal amended and second hearing postponed until June 17.
Please wait for updates!
Quick update: Thanks to the hard work from dedicated local herpers and open ears from the council members, this broadly sweeping and far overreaching proposal has been amended but is still unacceptable with a complete ban on some animals including snakes over ten pounds and some small pets such as sugar gliders. We suspect it will be amended again and will post updates as the process moves along.
Special thanks to all involved in the fight for common sense over the propaganda radical animal rights fanatics including local stakeholders, aviculturists, and the great people at Stahl Exotic Animal Veterinary Services. USARK is only part of the equation and we appreciate those stepping forward to protect the freedoms of all responsible animal and pet owners.
Submit comments by one or more of the below methods:
1. Email: email@example.com, Countyboard@arlingtonva.us
2. Quick Action Alert: After sending emails to the above, complete the quick Action Alert at www.usark.org/campaign/action-alert-arlington-county-va.
3. In–person statement: Attend the public hearing on June 17 in the County Board Room, 2100 Clarendon Blvd., Third Floor, Arlington, VA 22201
4. Online: Arlington CiviComment tool at www.arlingtonva.civicomment.org/code-change-prevent-keeping-wild-or-exotic-animals-pets
5. Mail or hand delivery to below. Write "NO to Chapter 2 exotic animal ban" or similar on envelope.
Arlington County Department of Human Services
Attn: Lyn Hainge
2100 Washington Blvd., Second Floor
Arlington, VA 22204
Sample letter/statement (Remember to be professional and civil at all times!)
Email address and mailing address can be found above.
Copy/paste one of these subject lines, or write your own:
- NO to Chapter 2 exotic animal ban
- Chapter 2 animal proposal is unjust and unsound
- Chapter 2 revisions are unjust
- Chapter 2 proposal is bad government
Copy/paste this sample letter. It is important to personalize/edit at least some of the letter.
Arlington County Board,
As a responsible Arlington County pet owner, I would like to voice my opposition to the proposed changes to Chapter 2. These amendments will unjustly remove my freedom to responsibly keep many common pet species. Frankly, the proposal is irrational and far overreaching without warrant or justification. It's an extreme example of bad government and nanny statism. Also, there is already a State law regulating many of these species (4 VAC 15-30-10).
According to a recent study from the American Pet Products Association (APPA), over 32% of American households have pet species other than dogs and cats. This proposed change potentially affects 1/3 of Arlington County residents. Many people who keep non-traditional or exotic pets, also breed them on occasion and sell the offspring. The responsible keeping and breeding of these animals in no way negatively affects my neighbors or the County.
It can only be assumed that this proposal is a completely biased step to remove all non-traditional pets from Arlington County. The animal someone chooses to keep responsibly as a pet is not your decision to make. In many situations, non-traditional pets are better suited to households than dogs or cats, especially in urban areas such as Arlington.
How did you decide upon the completely arbitrary ban on 4' snakes? The two most common pet species, corn snake and ball pythons, both reach lengths over 4'. There are literally tens of thousands on these snakes kept as pets, not to mention the dozens of other species which get longer than 4'. Constrictor snakes (both mentioned species are constrictors) do not pose a public safety risk or a risk to first responders.
Let's review your stated illogical reasoning:
- "better protect humans and animals"-Removing the freedom of pet choice from responsible Americans does absolutely nothing to protect animals or humans.
- "align Arlington with neighboring jurisdictions"-Is doing what your neighbor does always a good idea? Why is replicating a bad law a good idea?
- "provide additional safety for first responders"-Are you saving first responders from 4-ounce sugar gliders or 12-ounce hedgehogs as the larger species listed are already on the statewide restricted animal list? While the concern is appreciated, as are our first responders, the restricted animals located in Virginia could be obtained from the State.
It is most troubling that, apparently, these proposed changes are simply due to biases by members of the Board. This is a tyrannical abuse of power. You are using your authority to remove freedoms simply because you don’t agree with them. There is no rational reasoning to support this amendment.
This action is un-American and unjust. I hope you’ll address concerns from those affected. Thank you for your time and consideration on behalf of this Arlington County resident and have a good day.